• There is no entry for this painting in the painting diary. While it is not uncommon for paintings made before 1925, it is even rarer for paintings made in 1918. We wonder how much his fires in 1922 and 1934 are the reason. We know he mostly wrote his painting diary from memory in the 1940s but how many paintings were forgotten because the business ledgers were lost as well?
We have two painting, very similar in appearance with some obvious differences and others
more subtle. The most apparent is the time of year. This painting is past autumn's peak by a couple weeks and
must be mid-to-late November. Since we have seen this painting in person and can confirm it is dated 1918
after his signature (as RSW did with all known 1918 and many 1919 paintings), the fact the he returned four
years later is no surprise. We know of three other examples of the artist returning to a location to paint it
again. However, three of those four, were more than a decade later. Because the brushwork is similar, yet
different enough to be distinct, it suggest to us his appreciation of the scene. Still, as a group, Woodward
did not paint more than a dozen Deerfield River paintings and a third of those were of the Charlemont's old
covered bridge AFTER it was destroyed in the devastating hurricane of 1938.
We wonder if these two
canvases were meant to be a comparison in contrast. Spring is the artist least covered season because the thaw
makes travel very difficult for him and November one of his favorite months. CONTINUED BELOW
⮟
⮜ The illustration to the left highlights the area we believe Woodward painted. Our reasoning is simple, the hills are not big enough to be further west and just big enough to be further east. Also note on the map we captured there are flat spots meeting fairly strong slopes. There is also the right spot of a zig and zag of the river with a matching ridge line.
⮟ For your convenience we provide you a side by side comparison of both canvases ⮟