From a description in a 1929 newspaper article. We have determined. that this is its own
painting and does not match the other two paintings by the same name. We list two years associated with this
artwork because of the two exhibitions it is listed to have hung, although it does not appear on the 1926
Lyman exhibit card list, we have in Woodward's own handwriting on another card where he adds this and two
other paintings missing.
As we pointed out previously, we are certain the 1926 painting is not the
1919 painting (to the right) because that artwork was bought by Mrs. Everett in Pasadena, CA, and she likely bought it after it exhibited in 1922 at the
J.H. Miller Gallery. Moreover, many of the "early style" paintings made in 1924, 25, and 26, did not sell at
Lyman. Though a success, he sold two-thirds of the 26 canvases (17) with nine paintings exhibiting again a
number of times thereafter. For the description of the 1926-29 painting is offered below
⮟
"......October is a powerful bit of painting---rich in
color contrast and typically New England in an almost undefinable way...."
"How effectively he has
placed that red tree in the picture entitled October."
⮝ Our remarks on Philpott's description is that it is only helpful in the sense that he is NOT describing the 1919 "October." There are no red trees on that canvas. Where it does not help is that he fails say where the red tree is placed. Our first though was a 1926 painting seen below⮟
We selected three known paintings that feature "red" trees. It is unlikely this painting would be similar to Autumn Brilliance, since both hung at Lyman. Below are two more options and the only chance to be similar is the 1923 October Pageant. Beyond that, the options are slim, to see for yourself, visit the Burning Autumn Gallery